Is that another grey hair?



I hate getting old but unfortunately, I have not found the cure for it as yet. Not with standing. I shall keep looking for some Dorian Gray substitute or perhaps I shall resort to the modern equivalent of Bex, a cup of tea and a lie down..  At this juncture, I may need to. You see, I have reached a point in life where I am old enough to apply for a pension but by virtue of the points of eligibility I don’t qualify and this government wants to make it even harder for the likes of me ever getting it, I own two houses albeit, one of them is overseas and waiting for a buyer.

Sometime last year Senator David Leyonhjelm, the crossbench Senator from South Australia, was callous enough to call for a restriction on the pension on the basis that pensioners should feel a sense of shame in taking a pension since is showed a lack of life planning by the recipients.

But the simple fact of the matter is, some 2.4 million people across Australia now receive the Aged pension or around 10% of the population. According to data from Centrelink, Shepparton district swings the pendulum higher with around 20,000 grey hairs which is nearer to 20% of the population.  We are an aging community.

The original concept of the pension, established almost 110 years ago is interesting. It was to provide every person over the age of 65 with a sustainable income, at that time around 25% of the basic salary or $52 a year. It has moved on since then but it still is less than 10% of what Senator Leyonhjelm is receiving as a point of entry politician.

During the last war, Chifley did a sleigh of hand with taxation and finding a means of paying for the war effort without raising taxes by creating a National Pension Fund that was subsequently brought into  consolidated revenue by Menzies sometime early in his leadership. While the pension fund accumulated more than it was paying out, it was too good to simple leave there when they had other debts.

The aged pension is without doubt, the largest component of the social welfare bill. Projections for this year are that it will cost an estimated $69 billion dollars, along with all other disability and support pensions make up 42% of government spending not including GST distributions.

Australia, like many other OECD countries is an aging population. We are no longer having nine kids, now couples are lucky to have one, the average family size being 2.4 people.

Now, there is no going back on our aging population, we need more people of course which is the premise behind increasing our migration numbers rather than decreasing them.

We also need to look at the means of paying for it all. Getting a better deal with corporate taxes would be a good start. There are not many of them however some of our largest and most major companies through various international tax arrangements are currently paying no tax here in Australia in preference to paying lesser amounts in places like the Cayman Islands or Singapore, which if they were paying here, would cover a large chunk of the social security bill.

It is somewhat ironic that the government are now wanting to further decrease the corporate tax bill which begs the question, who are they working for?

When you work for fifty years or more and contribute to the national income, it is possibly reasonable that you might expect to live at a level something more substantially than a third world income.

2 Replies to “Is that another grey hair?”

  1. I believe there are. We presently have low unemployment and we have big business using skilled worker visas to bring people in temporarily which would suggest we are in need of workers.

    We need more social housing for sure with 100,000 people sleeping rough around the country but there is so much vacant investment housing as well.

    The jobs going overseas unfortunately are the high end jobs, the scientists and the like since this government is almost anti-science. We could have been the smart country. Ask farmers after seasonal workers if there are jobs available.

    I think if you look at the profiles, the majority of migrants might start on welfare but very soon get off it. The welfare bill is increasing but as I say in the post, a lot of that increase is our aging population. The age pension is the largest part of the welfare bill, we need more tax payers to support it.

  2. one question, if we need more people and do that through migration, are there jobs for these people? houses? schools? Currently jobs seem to be all heading overseas, our manufacturing is buggar all, foreign ownership is increasing.

    If people come here and there are no jobs for them, how will that be advantageous to us? Will it only increase our welfare bill, which only seems to be getting larger all the time?

    Also, i agree with you that the state of affairs with corporate taxes is a disgrace, especially with overseas business owners making political donations. Indeed, where do their allegiances lie?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *